丁克

B |     UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has come up with a plan to repurpose arable land which is at present used for crop-based biofuels so that more food might be grown as food prices and inflation soar.,However, officials of US President Joe Biden made it clear on 26 June that Washington wouldn't "okay" Johnson's initiative in a bid to protect American farmers and avoid breaking climate commitments. According to the British daily newspaper, The Daily Telegraph, Germany appears to back the British premier's plan whereas Canada and the US have rejected it. Johnson's plan needs the unanimous support from all G7 nations for it to fly.,"I think the rift is one that happens periodically between the UK and US - without minimizing the significance, there have been tensions on trade issues for some years now (including the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on the UK). How serious it becomes is questionable," says Professor Robert Singh, specialist in contemporary US politics at the University of London's Birkbeck College.,UK on Collision Course With US as BoJo Set to Prioritize Food Production Over Green Energy06:06 GMT,Previously, Johnson and Biden clashed over Brexit customs issues and the Northern Ireland Protocol with the American president reportedly accusing the British premier of "inflaming" Irish tensions ahead of the 2021 G7 Summit in Cornwall.,Given the record of friction between Biden and Johnson, it appears likely that if the UK does legislate to revise the Northern Ireland Protocol (NIP), Washington will react negatively, Singh suggests. Downing Street has published a Bill proposing to change the protocol unilaterally in favor of British businesses and communities. It would also grant the British government powers to amend the agreement further if appropriate.,"It's possible that [the NIP amendment] could then inflame the trade issue further," says Singh. "[I]t will worsen the Johnson government's record, at a time when the cost of living crisis, inflation, and many other problems are piling up. It's probably, on balance, yet another own goal by Johnson - an unnecessary diplomatic row that was avoidable.",To complicate matters even more, Johnson skipped a climate summit hosted by Biden for world leaders earlier this month, despite 15 other heads of state and government attending the virtual gathering. According to Politico, the premier's absence "reverses a previous snub from Biden" who declined to attend a climate meeting Johnson hosted on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in 2021.,Yet another diplomatic row rocked London and Washington after the UK issued licences to four British flagged vessels to fish for Patagonian toothfish - also known as Chilean seabass - near Antarctica. Earlier, a 26-member fishing regulatory body, the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) set specific catch limits for the species. The US immediately accused Britain of breaching the commission's rules, rendering the catch illegal. The feud could lead to an import ban on Patagonian toothfish, according to the media.,Northern Ireland Protocol Used as Proxy in Tory Efforts to Unseat BoJo, Legal Expert Says14 June, 18:55 GMT,UK-US Spat Can be Fixed Quicker Than That Between UK and EU,The UK-US tensions are unlikely to lead to a serious breach in relations in the near future, insists Dr Roslyn Fuller, director of the non-profit think-tank Solonian Democracy Institute and the author of the book Beasts and Gods: How Democracy Changed Its Meaning and Lost Its Purpose.,"Johnson and Biden are both career politicians and will probably behave pragmatically," says Fuller. "Even were they to exaggerate their differences in the press to play to their respective electorate, this would be unlikely to affect their highly connected working relationship greatly.",Though the NIP issue could cause some additional tensions between the UK and the US, the nations are likely to solve relatively minor dilemmas, such as the spat over the toothfish catch, according to the author.,"As the two major English-speaking powers and neoliberal nations that have cooperated intensely on military matters in the past, it would be quite stupid on their part to indulge in any serious in-fighting," she says. "I think the US is paying increasing attention to Germany as the remaining European superpower, but that doesn't necessarily have to come at the expense of the British.",However, when it comes to the UK and the EU, the rift between them indeed appears to be deepening, according to Fuller:,"Britain also obviously lost faith in the EU and its regulatory regime, and clearly wants to go its own way to the extent that it can," the author says. "This is thus an example of increasing global fragmentation."。每当有网友想要「小发雷霆」时，就派出她作为自己的首席「代指」人。这个动作，第一次出圈是在6月22日的WNBA赛场。

C | 不妨直接看现场原图：那天，印第安纳狂热以86-77击败菲尼克斯水星。

D | 第四节，凯特琳·克拉克（Caitlin Clark）和德万娜·邦纳（DeWanna Bonner）因激烈的身体对抗而发生冲突，克拉克队友索菲·坎宁安（Sophie Cunningham）很快走了上来，直接站出来和邦纳正面对上。接下来，坎宁安和邦纳两个人互相指向对方，紧张的局势随后被队友拉开。但坎宁安一边被往回带，一边继续面无表情伸手指着邦纳，持续了22秒。这不是坎宁安第一次在克拉克卷入身体对抗后站出来。2025年，克拉克在和杰西·谢尔顿（Jacy Sheldon）发生冲突后，坎宁安就曾用一次被许多球迷视为「替队友出头」的强硬犯规，被开玩笑称为「保镖」。

E | 本来是再寻常不过的维护队友行为，但这次不同——因为这一指，坎宁安彻底出圈了。先是铺天盖地的动图、评论，再是网友们各种形式的二创，甚至在近期拉斯维加斯UFC 329现场，坎宁安被邀请到现场复刻这个经典画面。

F | 图源：坎宁安社媒一个简单的伸手指人动作，为什么会在不到三周时间里一路火到篮球场之外，变成谁都认识的网络梗？首先便是这个动作足够直白。比起推搡、拉拽，或者难以听清的口角，伸手指人几乎没有理解门槛。它足够简单，也足够明确。你不需要知道前因后果，就能瞬间感知那种不满的情绪。正因如此，它很容易脱离比赛，被复制到体育、娱乐甚至日常生活，成为一种可以不断套用的情绪表达模板。除了易于理解和传播之外，指人动作的爆红的另一大重要原因还在于它恰好发生在凯特琳·克拉克身边。过去一年，克拉克不只是狂热队的核心，也成了整个WNBA流量、讨论中心之一。在比赛的收视率、讨论度都因她而大涨的同时，围绕她的人更容易进入公众视野，她的队友坎宁安就是典型例子。然而，当人们关注重心从「看球」持续倾斜向「看球员」时，WNBA的舆论生态也发生着巨大变化。直观现象便是，以知名球星为中心，球员在场上会被球迷简单划分自己人或对面的人。

G | 球场上的争端，本该由裁判和规则解决，留在场内。但在这种二元生态下，质疑、歧视甚至是仇恨，都有可能蔓延至赛场之外。近日，水星队队员阿丽莎·托马斯（Alyssa Thomas）就因另一个与克拉克相关的争议动作，在赛后还接连收到带有种族歧视言论以及威胁家人生命安全的短信。比赛中阿丽莎因为这个动作受到了处罚克拉克和狂热主教练斯蒂芬妮·怀特（Stephanie White）都先后谴责了这种越过比赛本身的人身攻击和生命威胁。联盟随后也重申，任何形式的仇恨和骚扰都不可接受，并再次强调对球员的保护措施。无论是为队友站出来的保护者，还是对手，这些标签都只是互联网从球员们身上提取出来的一个切面。因为WNBA持续火热的舆论环境，一个来自赛场的手势，拥有了一段远超比赛本身的生命。但除了这些手势、切面，WNBA球员们值得被记住的其实还有更多，可以是一场表现、一种姿态，也可以是更多立体、鲜活的故事。